Tag Archives: Church Leadership

Your Church Might Be A Country Club If…(Part 2)

27 Wednesday Mar 2019

Posted by in Christian Life, Church, Discipleship, Gospel, Leadership, Ministry; Leadership;, Mission

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

In my previous post I began outlining four identifiers that your church might be more like a country club than a church. Once again, I’m not knocking country club memberships. If you are a member of one, I give you permission to sing along with Travis Tritt—loud and proud—“I’m a member of a country club….” [If you are a country music fan, maybe you just got that song stuck in your head for the remainder of the day. You’re welcome!] 

The reason for my posts is that I fear many American believers view the church as a country club. Or at the very least, they practically behave as if the church was indeed a country club. Regardless, viewing the church or behaving as if the church is a country club distorts both the identity and the mission of the church. 

Knowing the characteristics of a country club can help protect the church from becoming or being viewed as such. Here are the remaining four identifiers that your church might be more of a country club that members pay for than the church that Jesus died for.

1—Your church might be a country club if your members worry about public disruption.

One of the benefits of being a member of a country club is that you don’t typically have to worry about the public infringing upon your property. In other words, the members of the club can enjoy the exclusivity of the club’s amenities. They don’t have to vie for tee times, tables in the dining room, the pool, or the tennis courts. In short, they can enjoy their club with minimal crowd or public disruption.

For many churches, and church members, they don’t like crowds—they don’t like newer people coming in and disrupting the way things are. They want their same parking spot for both their car and their rear. In addition, church members may fear more newer people means more newer things. In other words, if the public comes in, they may shape the church house into something they aren’t comfortable with. 

I know what many church members say. They say, “We want to grow and reach new people.” What they really mean, however, is, “We want to grow and reach new people as long as it’s convenient and agreeable for us.” In other words, they are fine as long as the newer people don’t rock the boat or disrupt what they have going on. It’s incumbent to keep in mind, Jesus didn’t die for His people to protect their exclusivity, but for His people to proclaim and demonstrate the inclusivity of the gospel—that Jesus is for all mankind. 

2—Your church might be a country club if you view other churches (“clubs”) as competition. 

The last thing you want if you are a club owner—or a club member at that—is people leaving and going down the street to the newer, bigger, and fancier club. In fact, if a club starts losing lots of members to the club down the street, they begin to see them as their big bad competitor. As a result, there tends to be a sour taste towards the “other” club. In addition, there tends to be reactive measures taken by the “losing’ club. Instead of having their own identity and crafting the club accordingly, they copycat the club down the street—thinking such measures will plug the leak. 

Churches should be different. Churches aren’t in competition with one another but are partners in the Great Commission. I believe the reason why many churches and church members see each other as competitors is because for the last thirty years or so, there’s been a lot of swapping going on. Something happens at one church, and people leave to go down the street to the other. Or, another church sprouts up with a “better” band, preacher, children’s ministry, and environment, and people from the “older” church leave to attend the newer. Such a cycle is built upon consumerism which drives competition. 

Church leaders must learn to be secure in who God has called them to be and what He has called them to do. While every church has the same call and task—or the same message and mission—the way they go about enacting them should have flexibility. In other words, church shouldn’t come in a one-size fits all mold. As J.D. Greear expresses, “We are to marry the mission [and the message], and date the method.” Every church must seek the face of God to determine how they are to flesh out their call and task there in their locale. Keep in mind, it may not look like the church down the street. And that’s ok. 

Don’t misunderstand what I’m saying. I’m not suggesting there’s nothing to learn from one another. I think there is plenty we can glean from the various models and styles of church. However, the minute we see another church as a competitor and not as family is the minute we Americanize the church’s mission—to be better than the church right down the street. 

The minute we see another church as a competitor and not as family is the minute we Americanize the church’s mission.

3—Your church might be a country club if 99.9% of your programs and events evolve around members.

Have you ever noticed the calendar of a country club? Almost every single event and program is for its membership. There might have been more, but the only event that I saw on the calendar that involved outsiders was the member-guest golf tournament. Like I said, there could have been more, I just didn’t see them. Such a practice shouldn’t be odd though. Should it? The members do pay for the club’s services and amenities. Thus, it would only stand to reason every event and program would revolve around the members.  

Having every event and program revolving around members isn’t a bad thing if implemented at a country club. However, it is detrimental if implemented at a church. The church is a body or organization where the membership doesn’t exist for itself but for those who have yet to join. If churches aren’t intentional, they will find that most of what they do is geared for insiders not outsiders. But if churches will stay true to their Christ-given mission, they will develop their ministries and programs with non-members in mind. If not, they are well on their way to becoming a country club. 

4—Your church might be a country club if you create an environment of becoming before belonging. 

If you are going to belong to a country club, you will have to become of member of that club. It is as simple as that. Sure, some clubs offer you an opportunity to try out the golf course and the kitchen prior to joining. Nevertheless, if you are going to belong and find community at the club, you will first have to become a member. Just out of curiosity, I wonder what would happen if clubs allowed people to belong to the club before they became a member? Perhaps more people would join?

In the church there’s a small debate over the progression of people’s faith and involvement with the church. Do people believe (in Christ), then become (a member of a church), and then belong (to the community)? Do they belong, then believe, and then become? Once again, I don’t believe there is a one-size fits all for every person. However, I do believe the church must be flexible on each person’s process and progression in the faith and involvement with the church. 

Having said that, I do believe churches should be very careful at creating environments that prohibit people from experiencing Christian community before they actually become a Christian. In other words, churches would do well to create safe environments for people to belong before they believe and even become. Just out of curiosity, what kind of impact do you think a church could have if they created safe places for nonmembers (people far from God) to belong as they explored faith, engaged in a Christian community, and witnessed authentic worship? 

Country clubs are places that provide services people pay for, whereas the church is a body of believers providing service for the king who died for them.

In closing, there’s definitely more that could be said with regards to churches behaving more like a country club than what Jesus intended for them. The reality is, country clubs are places that provide services people pay for, whereas the church is a body of believers providing service for the king who died for them. When church leaders and church members keep this at the forefront of their mind, they will be a missional vehicle advancing the good news to a people in desperate need rather than a recreational vehicle enjoying the amenities of a religious club. 

Your Church Might Be A Country Club If… (Part 1)

25 Monday Mar 2019

Posted by in Christian Life, Church, Discipleship, Gospel, Kingdom, Leadership, Ministry; Leadership;, Mission, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

I have been involved at three country clubs in my life. The first CC was under my parents’ membership in Covington, TN. The second CC was as an employee serving as the assistant to the golf pro in Canton, GA. The third was at an affordable club I found in Louisville a few years back. Let me just say, I have an affinity for golf!

I’ve also grown up in the church and have been in vocational ministry for almost 20 years—serving as a Lead Pastor for the past 12. Let me say, with all her blemishes and imperfections (of which I am a part), I love the church! 

Having been a part of both country clubs and churches—as well as studying the North American landscape—I think for many Christians it’s easy to confuse country club membership with church membership. In this two-part blog, I want to highlight eight identifiers (four in each post) that your church might be a country club.

Keep in mind, Jesus didn’t die for the church to be a country club. Jesus died and rose again for the church to be a commissioned conduit to take the good news to the ends of the earth! 

With that in mind, here are four identifiers that your church might be a country club.

1—Your church might be a country club if the goal is to keep members happy. 

A country club is a service provider. For many, they provide golfing, swimming, tennis, dining, and entertainment services. Thus, if their services don’t appeal and appease the members, they will soon experience a decrease in membership. As a result, if members complain about the conditions of the locker rooms, the quality of the greens, the attire of the staff, or the taste of the food, country clubs will work to rectify the problem. A club’s future and sustainability is fueled by the satisfaction of the members. 

A church, on the other hand, is a mission vehicle. A church’s goal isn’t to keep members happy consuming a service, but to equip members to be sent out proclaiming and demonstrating good news. However, many churches have been turned into country clubs as they field an onslaught of complaints and suggestions. When churches are crafted into the image of consumers they distort the image of their Savior. 

2—Your church might be a country club if the leaders are seen more like a board of directors.

Many country clubs have a group of people called the board of directors that oversee the activities and effectiveness of the organization. In short, the board is mostly comprised of business people that are mainly concerned with two things: membership happiness and the club’s bottom line. Thus, board of directors are inclined to measure a club’s success based upon the bottom line of bodies and budgets. 

In the New Testament, church leaders were never referred to of as a board of directors, but as apostles, pastors (elders), evangelists, shepherds, and teachers (Ephesians 4:11). And these leaders were to equip the members for the work of the ministry (Ephesians 4:12). Did you catch that? Those who belong to the church are to do work! Gospel work! I don’t know about your club, but I never experienced my club calling for a work day for members to tidy up the property. Members pay others to do the work so that they can enjoy the benefits of the club. 

Church leaders aren’t a board of directors but a body of developers.

Beware, churches that are primarily built on a country club mentality will experience a bottom-line effect when they have leaders that call members to work—getting their hands dirty—for the sake of God’s glory and others’ good. 

3—Your church might be a country club if people with affluence carry all the influence. 

For many, membership to a country club carries a connotation of status and wealth. Our culture is conditioned to treat those of status and wealth differently than those without the position or the deep pockets. I’ve witnessed first-hand how the owner of a multi-million-dollar company received preferential treatment compared to the retiree who drove a UPS truck. It’s not that the retiree was treated poorly, he just didn’t carry the weight the million-dollar business man did. 

I’ve also witnessed first-hand in the church world how status and wealth can get one a prominent place of influence in the church. Never mind the person of affluence swims in a theological, missional, and spiritual kiddie-pool. Yet, because of the influence his affluence provides him, he is able to bend the ears of the board of directors (leaders), which ultimately gives direction to the bent of the church.   

Affluence should not be a factor for giving one influence in the church. People that should be given a voice and weight are those who exhibit an authentic and deep abiding love for Jesus and His mission.

Success in business doesn’t mean maturity in mission. 

4—Your church might be a country club if the membership is homogenous. 

There’s seldom diversity in club members. Most members are cut from the same piece of cloth. They live in the same area, go to the same schools, dress the same way, vote for the same political party, etc. In short, most country clubs are set up for homogeneity. 

The church, however, was birthed for diversity. With the mission to create a peoplefrom all peoples, Jesus envisioned a diverse church—a third race as some have expressed. Therefore, churches should be about engaging, reaching, and cultivating the diversity represented in the community around them. Therefore, churches should experience racial, cultural, socio-economic, political, and to some extent denominational diversity. In doing so, the church demonstrates the in-breaking reign of God to unite a people from all peoples through the blood of the Lamb! 

In closing, I’m for both country clubs and churches. Given my affinity for golf, I understand the benefits and environments of country clubs. Given my love for Jesus and having studied His affection and mission for the church, I understand who the church is and what the church is to do. But the two entities are entirely different! A church isn’t a country club, and a country club isn’t a church. 

When God Builds a Church

15 Thursday May 2014

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Fourteen years ago Bob Russell, former pastor at Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, KY, wrote a book titled, When God Builds a Church. The reason I bring his book up is because this morning, as I was praying, this thought kept coming to my mind, “when God builds a church.” As a pastor, it can seem that many look to me to build the church. To be fair, many wouldn’t articulate it quite like that; nevertheless churches do have the tendency to put a heavy load on pastors to build the church.

Why is this? If I had to speculate, I would say that this is mainly attributed to what we have witnessed within the North American church over the past thirty years. While the church attendance has slowly declined, the rise of the mega-church and large church has steadily risen. In fact, I read an article this past week that said 90% of all church attendees will attend a church running over 400. We are living in the days of the large church while the smaller churches slowly disappear.

When it comes to larger churches, they have become the voice and example for the evangelical world. Their voices speak both in the culture and to the church. Other churches and leaders in the evangelical world has seen and heard from many of the pastors and leaders from the larger churches about what it takes to lead the church to grow. The resources (books, articles, and conferences), narratives (stories of the growth of the church), principles, and guides have tended to become the “how to” guide for building a church. As a result many of the smaller churches see the larger churches and want implement what they are doing in an effort to grow too.

In all honesty, I think many of these resources are very beneficial for pastors and churches when it comes to them thinking through their mission, vision, structure, and strategy. There is much to glean from many of these voices.

While I have gleaned and still glean from the wisdom of many of the past and current voices, today I was reminded that I must guard against doing what others have done in an attempt to manufacture growth. Rather, I must trust, serve, and yield myself to our great God and King as a tool for him to use to build the church. Therefore, as I sat down today in my office, I jotted down at least ten elements that I see in the New Testament (and throughout Scripture) that are present as God uses his people to build his church and advance his mission throughout the world.

1)   Focus. When it comes to focusing, think mission. Within the pages of Scripture God has always desired that his people enact a focus (a mission) that is both vertical and horizontal. He wants his people to live for the glory of his great name, to spread the glory of his great name, and to live for the good (the blessing) of others.

2)   Faithfulness. In addition to the focus, God wants his people to be faithful in their focus. Our focus should not be a one-time deal, or something that we focus on for a season, but rather our focus of living for the glory of God and the good of others should be a constant. God desires that we be faithful to him, to his people (the church), and to loving the world.

3)   Faith. God desires for his people to give him everything that they have. Thus, his people have great faith, which leads to great sacrifice and great risks for his glory and mission. Faith propels us to deny ourselves, take up our cross, and follow Jesus. Faith leads us to believe that we will see greater things than what we have already seen if we continue to yield ourselves to Jesus.

4)   Fruit. Given the fact that God has awakened through Jesus (the gospel), as well as through his Spirit, we are a new creation. Through the Spirit of God he has given us new breath that has led to new life. We are fully alive in Jesus. Therefore, those things that are alive are reproducing. When it comes to God’s people producing fruit, they do so in a process called discipleship. This process includes both sanctification and multiplication. Sanctification is the process of being conformed into the image of Jesus, which will produce fruit (life) in areas of life that are conformed by him. Multiplication is the result of both personal and corporate evangelism. As God’s people are shaped into the image of Jesus, present in the life of unbelievers, and committed to planting churches in cities and communities throughout the world, fruit will continually be produced.

5)   Fervor. Those that God uses to build his church are the ones that possess great zeal, passion, love, excitement, enthusiasm, and intensity for his glory, his mission, his people, and his work. This fervor is contagious!

6)   Fellowship. God works through individuals who are connected to his body, his church. A church that exhibits unity and togetherness will be a church that God continues to use to build and grow his church. A church that exhibits division, malice, slander, and disunity will be a church that eventually disintegrates.

7)   Friction. Any time God builds a church there will be friction. Friction will be present both inside the body and outside the body. If no friction exists then movement—more than likely—is not taking place. Friction that happens in the body is dealt with quickly and in love. The church celebrates outside friction with perspective—understanding that the world hated Jesus, and thus, will hate his followers.

8)   Favor. Although there may be some outside friction, there will also be some favor that the church experiences. As the church glorifies God and embodies his presence and love in the city and community where they live, they will experience some favor from inhabitants (locals) of the city. If a church does not experience any favor from any place in the community or city, chances are they are not present or visible.

9)   Formation. I am using formation to describe a loose structure and strategy for engaging the community and city. Paul seemed to, at the very least, possess a loose strategy in engaging a city. Whether it was to observe culture (Acts 17), attend synagogues, work in the marketplace, teach in public spaces, or visit a local gathering spot, Paul seemed to have some intentionality in reaching a city.

10)  Foresight. Paul seemed to have a list of what he wanted to do. He was always thinking ahead. Throughout his letters, Paul notes his intention to visit various churches for encouragement and/or instruction. In addition, Paul told the church in Rome of his intention to go where the gospel had not been preached, as well as his intention to use them as a launching pad to go to Spain. Paul not only had plans for the present, but also for the future.

God desires to build his church. If we desire for God to build the church we currently lead or are part of, it may be helpful to ask whether or not these elements are in existence.